Nurse Author & Editor

Leslie H. Nicoll, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN Editor-in-Chief

Menu Skip to content
  • Home
  • About
    • Privacy Policy
  • Submit a Manuscript
    • Information for Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Copyright Transfer Form
  • Archive
    • 2020, Volume 30
    • 2019, Volume 29
    • 2018, Volume 28
    • 2017, Volume 27
    • 2016, Volume 26
    • 2015, Volume 25
    • 2014, Volume 24
    • 2013, Volume 23
    • 2012, Volume 22
    • 2011, Volume 21
    • 2010, Volume 20
    • 2009, Volume 19
    • 2008, Volume 18
    • 2007, Volume 17
    • 2006, Volume 16
  • Directory of Nursing Journals
  • Resources
    • For Authors
    • For Editors
    • For Reviewers
    • Checklists for Students, Faculty, and Mentors
  • Authors-in-Residence
  • Contact NA&E
May 15, 2006October 21, 2015Katrine Bohr

Good Peer Review

What Makes a Good Peer Review? An Author’s Perspective

Debbie Kralik

nurse author & editor, 2006, 16(2), 2

NAE 2006 16 2 2 Kralik

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
  • Click to print (Opens in new window)

Related

  • Peer Review

Post navigation

Previous Scholarly Publication
Next Choosing Journals and Editors

Editor-in-Chief

Leslie H. Nicoll
PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN

Subscribe to Nurse Author & Editor

Receive a notification every time a new article is published.

 

Loading

Nursing Journals Directory

A comprehensive, curated directory of nursing journals that authors can use to identify potential publication outlets. A collaborative venture between INANE and Nurse Author & Editor.

Publisher
Nurse Author & Editor
ISSN (online) 1750-4910

Recent Posts

  • Featured: Two Sides of Editorial Queries: Editors and Authors
  • Editorial Advisory Board Virtual Meetings
  • Deciding to Post a Manuscript Preprint
  • Addressing Racism in Editorial Practices
  • Timing it Right: Tips for Planning Remote Meetings Across Time Zones
  • Choosing a Videoconferencing Platform
  • Our Experiences of Preprint Publication
  • Why Do All Systematic Reviews Have Fifteen Studies?
  • Writing for Wikipedia
  • Mentoring the Novice Writer to Publication

Categories

  • Announcements (8)
  • Authorship (27)
  • Clinical Authorship (3)
  • Collaboration (27)
  • Editor Role (26)
  • Editorial (5)
  • Educational Process (17)
  • Ethical Issues (16)
  • Mythbusters (3)
  • Nursing History (2)
  • Peer Review (16)
  • Point/Counterpoint (1)
  • Predatory Publishing (4)
  • Publicity (4)
  • Publishing (19)
  • Reporting Research (33)
  • Social Media (10)
  • Student Authorship (11)
  • Writing Basics (60)

Archives

Meta

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org

Read NA&E on Facebook!

Read NA&E on Facebook!
Proudly powered by WordPress | Theme: Apostrophe by WordPress.com.

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.